Our new logo

pbr


We've had the same logo ever since we started our website in 2011, and I've been wanting to redesign it for a while now. I didn't think that a block textured by someone at Mojang should be our logo, I wanted to make my own. I thought the old logo was too 'noisy', it had too many colors. So everywhere that Redstone was visible on the block, I replaced it with a simple white color. The three dimensional figure is still visible in the new logo, but there is no border. I like the logo, but do you? Let us know if we should keep it!

[polldaddy poll="7080713"]

Comments

  1. I really don't feel like this captures the theme of Powered by Redstone at all, I mean, that could be anything, diamond, iron, gold, even coal.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really don't feel like this captures the feel of Powered by Redstone, I mean, it could be anything, Diamonds, Gold, Iron......Coal.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like it, it looks newer and more simple. :) And it was added on my birthday. But I have to agree, maybe add some red so it doesn't look like diamonds, or iron, of coal or gold.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't like it because Powered By Redstone is the name of the website. The icon looks more like powered by clouds. The redstone ore is what makes your website distinguishable and unique. I like the old icon much better.

    ReplyDelete
  5. um thats not redstone, the name of the site is "POWERED BY REDSTONE" so maybe find a more apropriate logo. it looks nice, but doesn't go with site name

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's ok, but it doesn't really go with the name "Powered By Redstone"...And it kinda looks like quarts...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Absolutly not. It doesn't resemble your site. Something that relates to Redstone would be better. Maybe a group of rocks colored red with electricity bolts coming off them?

    ReplyDelete
  8. It looks interesting, in the way how it has the feel of something in the third dimension, but it has two main drawbacks:
    1) It can resemble a 2d object if looked at blankly
    2) It can represent coal, diamond, gold ore as well as Redstone, It needs a bit of red in it, in my opinion

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yeah, it's just not redstone. Why not something like a piece of redstone dust? Or mabe a torch lighting up a sign saying Powered By and then a redstone dust. I dunno but at first I thought this was a joke but then I noticed it was may lol. And besides this is still a Mojang (R) design.

    ReplyDelete
  10. If youre gonna update the logo update the chrome app logo too.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree with everyone else. This really just doesn't seem to fit the blog properly. It seems a bit...awkward.

    ReplyDelete
  12. That sounds like an epic idea

    ReplyDelete
  13. just change the white to red and I think it will look much better :D

    ReplyDelete
  14. The alternative would be to make a custom texture pack, and use the redstone ore texture you create and also I think Nova could use something to make it more unique,

    ReplyDelete
  15. We were thinking something like that :D

    ReplyDelete
  16. I was thinking you could have a trail of redstone powering something like a computer or lightbulb

    ReplyDelete
  17. Leave it like it is, with the white and all. But add the border of the block in a red. and border the white with red too.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Here's what I was talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Like this? - The red parts coming off from the white is translucent, and the background is clear

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yup pretty much! That's way better than mine lol

    ReplyDelete
  21. This just doesn't look cool. The old logo was better. You need some red in there.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Oh my god that looks amazing. If I were to change the websites logo i would change it to a better version of the sparking Redstone. not that that's not good its just that it could be way better.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Im thinking some or all of the redstone should be changed too red but keep it 2dish.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I think that with slightly better resolution should be the new logo.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I think you should keep it, but make the 'white' 'red'

    ReplyDelete
  26. Time4Action2BelieveInHimMay 7, 2013 at 3:45 PM

    What about Asianinja's post? I like that person's idea too.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Very important GuyMay 8, 2013 at 12:06 AM

    Please remove this and you're kinda stealing my logo that i made a couple of months ago

    ReplyDelete
  28. the logo doesn't match the blog and it should look like a logo mot a white speckeld page error (no offence Corbin)

    ReplyDelete
  29. I can't help but to feel it's a bit ambiguous... Maybe it should be red instead of white? I love it though! Very simple and unassuming :)

    ReplyDelete
  30. Actually it could use some text as well, but other than that looks great

    ReplyDelete
  31. use red along with the white, i like the idea though

    ReplyDelete
  32. sorry if this spamming annoys u

    ReplyDelete
  33. skepter's is cool

    ReplyDelete
  34. i like the no stone on the redstone though

    ReplyDelete
  35. Time4Action2BelieveInHimMay 9, 2013 at 5:47 AM

    Like Asianinja's post if you want to change it!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Thanks so much Skepter for creating a mental picture of my "definition" of a logo!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Could you have ''powered by redstone'' spelled in redstone dust with an interactive lever that when flicked ''powers'' the dust lighting up the logo?

    ReplyDelete
  38. How do you change your profile picture on here?

    ReplyDelete
  39. You can go to disqus.com and in the top-right corner pick Edit Profile.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Probably don't need any more ideas...but what the heck: how about keepting the logo as you have it now (white on black, no border) but add a pure red "explosion" behind it. That would get the color red back in as well as give the cube some definition; finally, it communicates the idea of "power/electricity" somewhat. Just my $0.02. Cool to get all the feedback.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Yeah I agree with everybody. It is cool and all, but it would make more sense to change the white into a glowing red. That would look better. White doesn't fit it. I'll help work on it if need be.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I think that should be the logo but just scrap the border and it will have the same feel of simplicity as the current logo and captures the power of redstone :D

    ReplyDelete
  43. Hey check out my comment's reply by Skepter! The one with "The red parts coming off from the white is translucent, and the background is clear."

    ReplyDelete
  44. And as Spencer B. said, better resolution, and I think it would look great!! Thanks so much Skepter, Spencer B., and Tglvg11!

    ReplyDelete
  45. So technically, something like this: http://i.imgur.com/UFThFbO.png
    (Uploaded onto imgur.com to display translucency)

    ReplyDelete
  46. ... [Trackback]...

    [...] There you will find 2832 more Infos: poweredbyredstone.net/?p=1557 [...]...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment